Minor Pieces

Telling forgotten stories of chess players from the past.


Minor Pieces 42: Thomas Francis Lawrence (2)

We left Thomas Francis Lawrence in 1901, living in Westminster with his mother and brother, and now established as one of England’s leading players, having won the prestigious City of London Chess Club Championship on five occasions and represented his country in the Anglo-American cable matches.

In 1901-02 William Ward won the City of London Club Championship for the first time, with Lawrence in second place. He won the title back the following year, his sixth victory.

In 1902 Lawrence was appointed chess columnist for The People: his columns are exemplary for the time, including, as was standard, the latest chess news, a recent tournament game and a problem along with lists of those who had submitted correct solutions to the previous week’s problem. Along with his work for the Prudential and his regular chess playing commitments, he must have been pretty busy.

Star of Gwent 24 January 1902

He didn’t play in the 1901 cable match, but in both the two following years he was on top board against the great Harry Nelson Pillsbury, drawing both games. Here’s the 1903 game: click here and paste the pgn to play it through online.

[Event “Cable Match ENG-USA B1”]
[Date “1903.??.??”]
[White “Lawrence, Thomas Francis”]
[Black “Pillsbury, Harry Nelson”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. g3 e6 5. Bg2 d5 6. d3 d4 7. Ne2 e5 8. O-O h6 9. c3 Be7 10. Ne1 g5 11. cxd4 cxd4 12. f4 gxf4 13. gxf4 Bg4 14. h3 Bh5 15. Nf3 Bxf3 16. Bxf3 Qd7 17. f5 O-O-O 18. Bd2 Rdg8+ 19. Kh1 h5 20. Rc1 Kb8 21. Bg2 Ne8 22. Qe1 Bg5 23. Bxg5 Rxg5 24. Qd2 Rhg8 25. Rg1 Qe7 26. Bf3 Qf6 27. Rxg5 Rxg5 28. Rg1 Rxg1+ 29. Nxg1 Ng7 30. a3 a5 31. Bd1 Ka7 32. Nf3 Ne8 33. Ba4 Ka6 34. Bxc6 bxc6 35. Qh2 c5 36. Nxe5 Qg5 37. Qc2 Qg3 38. Qxc5 Qe1+ 1/2-1/2

It was common at the time for clubs to open their season with a novelty match. Richmond Chess Club, as we’ve seen, staged matches between the residents of Richmond and Sheen. Some clubs played matches between smokers and non-smokers, or, in this case, married men against bachelors, and in 1903 Thomas Francis Lawrence was on top board for the singletons against the illustrious veteran Joseph Henry Blackburne.

Greenwich and Deptford Observer 16 October 1903

Here’s the ‘capital game’. Blackburne’s loss, according to Stockfish, was caused by trading bishops on move 22, allowing the white knight into play.

[Event “Singles – Married: City of London CC”]
[Date “1903.10.09”]
[White “Lawrence, Thomas Francis”]
[Black “Blackburne, Joseph Henry”]
[Result “1-0”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 g6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Bg7 6. Be3 Nf6 7. Be2 d6 8. O-O h5 9. h3 Bd7 10. Qd2 a6 11. f4 b5 12. Bf3 Rc8 13. Rad1 Qc7 14. Nb3 O-O 15. Nd5 Nxd5 16. exd5 Nd8 17. c3 Nb7 18. g4 hxg4 19. hxg4 e5 20. fxe5 Bxe5 21. Kg2 f5 22. Bd4 Bxd4 23. Nxd4 Qd8 24. Qh6 Qf6 25. g5 Qg7 26. Qxg7+ Kxg7 27. Ne6+ Bxe6 28. dxe6 Nc5 29. Rxd6 Rfe8 30. Rd7+ Kg8 31. Bd5 Rb8 32. Rh1 Ne4 33. Rhh7 1-0

Sadly, shortly after this game his mother, Esther Jane (Izard) Lawrence, died at the age of 70, necessitating Thomas’s withdrawal from the City of London Club Championship, in which William Ward took the title for the second time. The burial record confirms that at some point after the 1901 census the family had moved from Westminster to 132 Palewell Park, Mortlake (it would now be considered East Sheen), one of the area’s most desirable roads, close to Richmond Park.  Esther was buried at St Mary the Virgin Church Mortlake, also the burial place of Queen Elizabeth I’s astrologer John Dee.

It’s worth a look at Rod Edwards’ retrospective ratings for 1903 at this point. Lawrence is ranked 54th in the world, with a rating of 2423. You’ll see Atkins (2542) and Burn (2540) ranked 13th and 14th, and then a gap to Blackburne (2451), Michell (2428) and Lawrence. Two distinguished veterans, then, and three up-and-coming young players.

In 1904 a major chess tournament took place in Cambridge Springs, a small town in Pennsylvania noted at the time for its mineral springs. The world’s leading players were invited to take part, and it was perhaps surprising for several reasons that Thomas Francis Lawrence was one of the participants. Apart from having a busy life, his seeming modesty and lack of ambition made him an unlikely choice: indeed, he was the only one of the eight European participants with no previous experience at this level.

Here’s a group photograph with Lawrence third from the right at the back.

Cambridge Springs 1904. In front: Barry, Napier, Showalter, Mieses, Fox, Píllsbury, Chigorin, Delmar and Marshall. Behind: Schlechter, Hodges, Helms (organiser), Janowski, Marco, Lasker, Lawrence, Cassel (organiser) and Teichmann.

And here he is again (on the right on the fourth row down) in this rather wonderful tournament souvenir.

The players and organisers of Cambridge Springs 1904, created for Isaac Rice by the noted New York artist, Franz Frenzel (From top to bottom:) H Helms, H Cassel, J Redding, W Van Antwerp, C Schlechter, FJ Marshall, Em. Lasker, M Chigorin, J Mieses, G Marco, I Rice, D Janowsky, JW Showalter, AB Hodges, AW Fox, HN Pillsbury, TF Lawrence, WE Napier, R Teichmann, H Ridder, E Delmar, J Barry

Lawrence scored 5½/15, about par for his (hypothetical) rating, but it could easily have been much better.

In Round 2 he could have obtained good winning chances against Delmar by trading queens on the right square instead of weakening his pawn formation. In Round 5 he lost on time in a winning position against Fox. In Round 8 he had a big advantage from the opening against Barry.  In Round 10 he made an elementary one-move blunder in a drawn rook ending against Lasker. In Round 11 he missed a win against Chigorin, and then, it appears, agreed a draw after his opponent made a losing blunder. In Round 15 he took a draw by repetition in a winning endgame against Showalter.

A score of 9 rather than 5½ would have been a great success, so what, I wonder, went wrong? The pressure of the big occasion? Lack of experience at this level? Nerves? Poor clock handling? There were other lessons to be learnt: while he did well with black, his play with the white pieces was often uninspiring: he was comprehensively outplayed by Janowski, Marco, Schlechter and Hodges.

His game against Napier demonstrated that, given the chance, he was a strong attacking player.

[Event “Cambridge Springs R4”]
[Date “1904.??.??”]
[White “Napier, William Ewart”]
[Black “Lawrence, Thomas Francis”]
[Result “0-1”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. a4 Rb8 9. axb5 axb5 10. dxe5 Be6 11. c3 Bc5 12. Nbd2 O-O 13. Bc2 f5 14. Nb3 Bb6 15. Nfd4 Nxd4 16. cxd4 f4 17. f3 Ng3 18. Re1 Qh4 19. Nc5 Bxc5 20. dxc5 c6 21. Ra6 Rbc8 22. b4 Nf5 23. Bxf5 Rxf5 24. Re2 Rh5 25. h3 Bxh3 26. Qd2 Be6 27. Qxf4 Qh1+ 28. Kf2 Rh2 29. Kg3 Rf8 30. Qe3 h5 31. f4 h4+ 32. Kf3 Rh3+ 33. Kf2 Rxe3 34. Bxe3 d4 0-1

Although Pillsbury was mortally ill with syphilis, it was still no mean feat to bring off a tactical finish against his old cable match opponent.

[Event “Cambridge Springs R7”]
[Date “1904.??.??”]
[White “Lawrence, Thomas Francis”]
[Black “Pillsbury, Harry Nelson”]
[Result “1-0”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 e6 4. Bg2 h5 5. Nf3 Be7 6. d4 d5 7. exd5 exd5 8. dxc5 d4 9. Ne4 Bf5 10. Qe2 Bxe4 11. Qxe4 Nf6 12. Qe2 Qa5+ 13. Bd2 Qxc5 14. O-O O-O 15. c3 dxc3 16. Bxc3 Rfe8 17. Rac1 Bf8 18. Qc2 Ne4 19. Qb3 Na5 20. Qa4 Nxc3 21. Rxc3 Qb4 22. Qc2 g6 23. Ng5 Rad8 24. Be4 Qd6 25. b4 Qf6 26. Nxf7 Rd4 27. Bxg6 Bxb4 28. Nh6+ Kf8 29. Bxe8 Bxc3 30. Qxc3 Kxe8 31. Qxa5 1-0

If you’re interested in finding out more about Cambridge Springs this book is recommended. This website is also informative.

It was at this point that we met him in our previous instalment, giving a simul at Richmond Chess Club in October 1904.

Did he, inspired by his participation at Cambridge Springs, take part in more tournaments?

The answer is ‘No’. He didn’t take part in the next three City of London Club Championships. The Anglo-American Cable Match didn’t take place, for various reasons, for three years between 1904 and 1906, so, it seems that, at this point, he was playing very little chess. Perhaps he had other things on his mind.

Perhaps he had a young lady on his mind. Take a look at this.

Here he is, aged 35, tying the knot with 21-year-old Mary Campbell Glover, on 18 April 1907, in St Botolph’s Church, Aldersgate, right by the Barbican and very near St Paul’s Cathedral. There are a few mysteries. We know his family owned a property in East Sheen at the time (as you’ll see shortly) but his address was given as Charterhouse Square, close to St Botolph’s. Perhaps he had a London pad, conveniently situated a few minutes’ walk from the new Prudential headquarters in Holborn.

Mary’s father, George Glover, was an insurance clerk and chess enthusiast: he and Thomas knew each other from the Insurance Chess Club.

There are a couple of interesting things to point out. Look at it more closely.

Look closely at Henry’s Rank or Profession. Biscuit Manufacturer? I’m not sure. When Thomas was born he was living in Velsen, where the North Sea Canal was being built. Was he manufacturing something to do with canals? Or did the construction workers need a supply of freshly baked biscuits? Any idea?

There’s something else strange. It was customary (and probably still is) to add ‘deceased’ under the father’s name in marriage registers, and, if you look at the complete page, you’ll see several examples. Thomas’s late mother Esther had claimed to be a widow on the census records between 1881 and 1901, but here’s her son implying that Henry was still alive. It was very common at the time for women who had split from their husbands to describe themselves as widows so perhaps that’s what had happened. Or perhaps Thomas had no idea whether or not Henry was still alive. Perhaps the omission of the word ‘deceased’ was just an oversight.

He had in fact returned to chess a few weeks before this happy event, taking part in the 1907 cable match, where he drew with the splendidly middle-named Albert Beauregard Hodges.

Later in the same year he returned to tournament play in the City of London Championship, taking the title for a seventh time just ahead of William Ward and George Edward Wainwright a 1-2-3 for Richmond and Twickenham chess.

He didn’t take very long to dispose of Rudolf Loman, a game which followed his game against Barry from Cambridge Springs for the first 14 moves.

[Event “City of London CC Championship”]
[Date “1907.??.??”]
[White “Loman, Rudolf Johannes”]
[Black “Lawrence, Thomas Francis”]
[Result “0-1”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. d4 exd4 7. e5 Ne4 8. Nxd4 O-O 9. c3 Nxe5 10. Re1 d5 11. f3 c5 12. fxe4 cxd4 13. cxd4 Bg4 14. Qd2 Nc6 15. Nc3 dxe4 16. Nxe4 f5 17. Nc5 f4 18. Bb3+ Kh8 19. Ne4 Qb6 20. Nf2 Bb4 0-1

This was to be Lawrence’s last appearance in the City of London Club Championship, but he continued to play club chess, both for Ibis and for the central London club Lud-Eagle, and county chess for Surrey. He was also a popular visitor to many London clubs, giving simultaneous displays and playing consultation games.

He also continued to play in the Anglo-American Cable Matches, drawing with Hermann Helms, who repeated moves in what, according to Stockfish, was a winning position, in 1908. Helms would go on to have a long and distinguished career as a chess promoter and journalist, being involved in organising the great New York tournaments in 1924 and 1927, and helping the young Bobby Fischer in 1951. Lawrence drew with his old rival John Finan Barry in 1909 and with Hodges again in 1910. In the final match, in 1911, he played a controversial game against Albert Whiting Fox, which I’ve annotated for the Richmond & Twickenham Chess Club website here. It’s well worth your attention.

This left his final record in the cable matches: played 10, no wins, six draws and four losses: perhaps slightly disappointing given his strength. Maybe the format didn’t bring out the best in him.

Meanwhile, Thomas and Mary had wasted no time at all in starting a family. A daughter, Margery (known as Peggy) was born in Mortlake just nine months after their wedding, on 28 January 1908, and baptised at St Botolph, Aldersgate on 28 March 1908. A year later, Joyce was born in Mortlake on 3 February 1909 and baptised at St Botolph on 1 May 1909. In the same year, on 23 December 1909, Ruth followed, but she was baptised on 10 April 1910 at Christ Church East Sheen, close to their family home. This is just a few yards from Sheen Mount Primary School, whose former headteacher, Jane Lawrence (no relation as far as I know) promoted chess very strongly: her pupils there included future IMs Richard Bates and Tom Hinks-Edwards.

It was at 132 Palewell Park that the census enumerator found the family in 1911: as you’d expect, Thomas, Mary and their three daughters were at home, along with Ellen Lloyd, a domestic servant, and Helen Wapshott, a nurse employed to care for the young girls.

The following year the family would be completed with the arrival of a son, named Roger Clive Lawrence, born on 12 November 1912, and baptised at Christ Church on 12 February 1913.

Earlier in 1912 the British Championships had taken place in Richmond, and the local club, of which Lawrence was now President, was involved in the organisation, but he wasn’t to be persuaded to play.

The opportunity to compete again on the international stage came knocking again the following year, when he was selected to travel to The Hague to play two matches against a Dutch team. His opponent on third board was Arnold van Foreest, great great grandfather of Jorden, Lucas and Machteld.

Their first game resulted in an exciting ending in which both players had advanced connected passed pawns. Lawrence eventually came out on top, as you can see here.

[Event “Netherlands v England The Hague R1”]
[Date “1914.04.11”]
[White “Lawrence, Thomas Francis”]
[Black “Van Foreest, Arnold Engelinus”]
[Result “1-0”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bb5 Nd4 5. Ba4 c6 6. O-O d6 7. Nxd4 exd4 8. Nd5 Nd7 9. Nf4 Be7 10. d3 Qa5 11. Bb3 g6 12. Ne2 Bf6 13. f4 Qh5 14. Qe1 O-O 15. Ng3 Qh4 16. Qf2 Nc5 17. f5 Nxb3 18. axb3 Be5 19. Bf4 f6 20. Qd2 c5 21. Rf3 g5 22. Bxe5 dxe5 23. b4 cxb4 24. Qxb4 Qh6 25. c3 Rd8 26. Ne2 dxc3 27. bxc3 Qf8 28. Qxf8+ Kxf8 29. d4 exd4 30. cxd4 b5 31. e5 a5 32. e6 Bb7 33. Rc3 Rdc8 34. Rxc8+ Bxc8 35. d5 b4 36. Nd4 a4 37. d6 a3 38. Re1 a2 39. d7 Bxd7 40. exd7 a1=Q 41. d8=Q+ Rxd8 42. Ne6+ Ke7 43. Rxa1 Rb8 44. Rb1 Kd6 45. Kf2 Ke5 46. g4 h5 47. h3 hxg4 48. hxg4 b3 49. Kf3 b2 50. Nc5 Kd4 51. Na4 Rb3+ 52. Kg2 Ra3 53. Nxb2 Kc3 54. Nd1+ Kc2 55. Rb6 Kxd1 56. Rxf6 Ra2+ 57. Kf3 Ra3+ 58. Ke4 Ra4+ 59. Ke5 Rxg4 60. Rg6 Rg1 61. f6 g4 62. Kf4 Ke2 63. Rxg4 Rf1+ 64. Kg5 Ke3 65. Kg6 1-0

He scored a quicker win in the return encounter when his opponent miscalculated the tactics on the open e-file.

[Event “Netherlands v England The Hague R2”]
[Date “1914.04.13”]
[White “Van Foreest, Arnold Engelinus”]
[Black “Lawrence, Thomas Francis”]
[Result “0-1”]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Be2 Bb4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxe7 Qxe7 7. d3 d5 8. O-O Bg4 9. exd5 Nxd5 10. Nxe5 Bxe2 11. Qxe2 O-O 12. f4 f6 13. d4 fxe5 14. Qc4 Rad8 15. fxe5 Rxf1+ 16. Kxf1 Qf7+ 17. Kg1 Rf8 18. Bg5 Qf2+ 19. Kh1 Qxd4 20. Qxd4 Nxd4 21. c4 Nf4 22. Rd1 Nd3 23. Be3 Nf2+ 24. Bxf2 Rxf2 25. Kg1 Rf4 26. g3 Re4 27. Kf2 c5 0-1

Club chess was curtailed during the war, and, with a growing family, Thomas Francis Lawrence had other demands on his time. He did, however, continue writing in The People up to January 1916. Here, he proposed the abolition of adjudications.

He’d have had a long time to wait.

He still seems to have been playing occasional club chess: in December 1919 Ibis welcomed a visiting team from Hastings, with Lawrence drawing with MCO co-author Richard Clewin Griffith on top board.

By 1921 the family had moved just round the corner, to 92 East Sheen Avenue, backing onto the house across the road from their previous address. Thomas was by now a Principal Clerk with the Prudential Assurance Company Limited, Mary and their four children were also at home, as was Helen Wapshott, a nurse a decade ago but now a general domestic servant.

Lawrence retained his interest in the game for the rest of his life. He still played occasionally for Ibis, in 1925 losing rather horribly on top board against George Marshall Norman in one of the regular Hastings v Ibis matches.

At some point in the 1930s, perhaps in 1931 when he retired as Richmond Chess Club President, Thomas retired from his job with the Prudential and retired to Comp Corner Cottage, Wrotham, Kent (between Sevenoaks and Maidstone), now a Grade 2 Listed Building. In 1939 he was living there with Mary, Ruth and two of Mary’s unmarried sisters, Louisa and Charlotte, the latter of whom was employed as a schoolmistress teaching domestic subjects.

His great-niece Jill recalled visiting him at Comp Corner. There were always huge jigsaw puzzles on a huge table in the house in Comp Corner, Wrotham, Kent. Tom was very clever, wealthy, occupation unknown, believed to have been South-East chess champion. Well, he was seven times champion of the City of London Chess Club, which was very much the same thing, as most of the strongest players in the South East took part.

The family finally moved to Storrington, Sussex in about 1950, where he died on 25 January 1953 at the age of 81. Here’s his obituary from the BCM: I presume FAR was Frank Rhoden.

Several mysteries remain. After a recent post on the English Chess Forum, Sussex chess historian Brian Denman contacted me with this message, repeated here with his permission.

The following story will probably have not surfaced for over fifty years. The Worthing Gazette of 27.7.1966, which had as its chess columnist Leslie A Head, reported that thirteen years previously the Worthing CC had in its possession one of the most famous trophies in the history of British chess. The Ibis Challenge Trophy was once the championship trophy of the City of London CC and was won outright by T F Lawrence in 1898. About sixteen or seventeen years ago Lawrence had come to live in Storrington. He invited David Armstrong and the columnist to play him an occasional game. On one of these visits he showed the trophy, which consisted of a set of large ivory chessmen and board. The next time that the columnist heard about the trophy was in January 1966, when a reader, who insisted on remaining anonymous, informed him that the trophy had been presented to the club by his widow. The club minutes in fact recorded that in March 1953 the trophy had been presented to the club by the widow on condition that, if the club parted with it, it should be to a person interested in chess. At that time the committee could not decide how to use the gift and the matter was left in abeyance. Head commented that the club might have held a Lawrence Memorial Tournament or displayed the trophy at Annual General Meetings. In a follow-up article in the Worthing Gazette of 10.8.1966 Head mentions that Eric Chettle, secretary of Worthing CC from 1955-59, remembers the trophy being in the club’s cupboard. The club wrote to Jacques and were told that the set would be worth £60, though the firm no longer made them. Mr Chettle said that he had sold it to a Chichester player for £18 or £20. The columnist commented that it was very sad that this priceless and historic trophy had been hidden away in a cupboard unrecognised and unappreciated until it was sold for a few paltry pounds. He asks why there was such secrecy over the sale. The Worthing Herald of 3.10.1958 mentions that a fall in the club’s membership had caused anxiety and the set had been sold for £20 to ease the club’s balance. One wonders if the set still exists.

There seems to be some confusion with regard to this trophy. I suspect that the BCF obituary was incorrect: my guess is that the Ibis Trophy was originally the Mocatta Trophy, which Lawrence won in 1898 for his third successive victory in the City of London Club Championship. He then donated it to the Ibis Chess Club, whereupon its name was changed. When they no longer had use for it, it returned to Lawrence’s possession, and was then passed onto Worthing Chess Club by his widow after his death in 1953. Anyway, if anyone has any idea what happened to it after it was sold to the ‘Chichester player’, do please get in touch.

There are two other mysteries as well: I still have no idea who exactly his father Henry Lawrence was. I’m also interested in what happened to his brother. He had three Christian names: Henry Arthur Edward, although he seemed to vary their order, so it should be relatively easy to track him down. We can pick up his birth in Velsen in 1873, and see him living with his mother in London in 1881, 1891 and 1901, up to her death in 1903, but after that the trail goes dead. I can find no marriage or death records with those three names in any order, nor any information on online family trees. Again, if you can help with either Henry, father or son, I’d love to hear from you.

What should we make of Thomas Francis Lawrence as a chess player? He was clearly very talented but his games don’t make a particularly strong impression today. With more ambition and perhaps a wider opening repertoire (I don’t think his predilection with the Spanish Four Knights helped very much) he might have reached grandmaster strength, but he didn’t play a lot at the top level and seemed to have had other priorities – work and family – in his life. Nevertheless, wins against Pillsbury and Blackburne and draws with Lasker and Chigorin are not to be sniffed at.

More than that, he comes across as a genuinely nice and modest person. Returning to the BCM obituary: ‘a kindly man, and always willing to give courteous advice to young chess-players seeking his aid’. A fine and fitting epitaph, I think. I’m very proud that Thomas Francis Lawrence was one of my predecessors as President of Richmond (& Twickenham) Chess Club.

Sources and Acknowledgements:

ancestry.co.uk

findmypast.co.uk

Wikipedia

Google Maps

chessgames.com

MegaBase

The City of London Chess Club Championship (Roger Leslie Paige)

British Chess Literature to 1914 (Tim Harding)

British Chess Magazine 1953

English Chess Forum

Chess Notes (Edward Winter)

BritBase

Gerard Killoran

Brian Denman

Hastings Chess Club website

Cambridge Springs 1904 website



One response to “Minor Pieces 42: Thomas Francis Lawrence (2)”

  1. […] which he won his section but lost to the winners of the other three sections in the play-off, with Thomas Francis Lawrence eventually winning his second […]

    Like

Leave a comment